کشتار دانش آموزان مدرسه دخترانه شجره طیبه میناب توسط ارتش آمریکا

In the Name of God
An Indictment for History; An Elegy for the Slaughtered Innocence in Minab and the Monumental Test of International Justice
Introduction: The Ominous Specter of Impunity and the Repetition of History
The world, following the devastating global wars and the bloody decade of the 1990s, made a pact with itself that humanity would never again witness the slaughterhouse of the innocent. It was intended that through the development of international legal mechanisms, war as an ominous phenomenon would be condemned and suppressed forever. However, history taught us with biting bitterness that whenever the sword of justice rusts in the sheath of expediency, criminals grow bolder.

Today, in the year 2026, the blood spilled on the ground in Minab is a continuation of the same blood shed by scythe and awl on the lush hills of Rwanda; it is the echo of the same wails of mothers who watched the mass graves of their loved ones in the United Nations safe zone in Srebrenica; and a repetition of the same scorched earths that swallowed the half-dead bodies of Myanmar’s children. The shameful inaction and failure of states to fulfill their collective responsibility in preserving human lives, alongside the perpetual immunity of past perpetrators, has sown the ominous seeds for the continuation of crimes in today’s world. The horrific tragedy of the massacre of girls at the “Shajareh Tayyebeh Primary School” in Minab is the most naked evidence of this claim, demonstrating that as long as immunity and “impunity” endure, pens must not cease writing bloody elegies over the corpse of justice. This text is not merely a petition, but an indictment to awaken the conscience of history and a cry for the blood price of the slaughtered innocence of the girls of Minab.

Act One: The Narrative of the Slaughter of Hope
As irrefutable evidence reveals; it is 10:43 AM on February 28, 2026. The sun shines kindly upon the courtyard of the “Shajareh Tayyebeh Girls’ Primary School” in Minab. The sound of children’s laughter, the hum of recess, and the turning of notebook pages are the only music flowing through this piece of earth. Little girls in school uniforms, with colorful backpacks and dreams as vast as the sky, were smiling at their bright tomorrows.

But merely two minutes later, at 10:45, the monster of war, with cold-bloodedness and ruthless precision, brought the roof of this safe haven crashing down upon the most innocent creatures on earth. This is not just a military attack; it is a direct shot at the beating heart of humanity, and the ruthless slaughter of “hope” at the altar of warmongering. When guided Tomahawk missiles of the United States military tear through the small chests of defenseless little girls, silence is no longer expediency; rather, it is a brazen complicity in the crime.

In the face of this profound human tragedy, tears and mourning are never enough. The sword of justice must be drawn from the scabbard of international law. The International Criminal Court (ICC) and the Rome Statute were penned precisely for such dark days, ensuring that no aggressor can hide behind the deceptive mask of “military error.”

Accordingly, drawing upon the clauses of the “Rome Statute,” a decisive, documented, and undeniable indictment against this horrific war crime is presented; an indictment expected to compel awakened consciences into action, and for public opinion, jurists, and international institutions to scream it upon the heads of its perpetrators.

Your Excellencies!

Honorable Judges of the International Criminal Court!

In the name of justice and before the conscience of humanity, the following points are submitted:

1. The Sacred Sanctity of the School; The Red Line of International Law and Unforgivable Desecration
A school is not a barracks; a classroom is not a bunker, and eight- or nine-year-old girls are not battlefield soldiers. International humanitarian law recognizes educational facilities as an absolutely safe and inviolable sanctuary.

Legal Foundation (Article 8(2)(b) of the Rome Statute): The international legislator states with utmost decisiveness in sub-paragraph (ix) that “Intentionally directing attacks against buildings dedicated to religion, education, art, science or charitable purposes… provided they are not military objectives” constitutes a full-fledged war crime.
Ground Reality: Satellite imagery and digital analyses clearly demonstrate that the Minab primary school has been separated from the military base for at least a decade, featuring a completely independent entrance and usage, with absolutely no dual or military function.
Conclusion: The blood spilled on the wooden desks of these classrooms is a seal of confirmation on the complete realization of the material element (actus reus) of this crime. Demolishing an “educational building” upon young students is a brutal crossing of the red line drawn by the Rome Statute to protect the lives of the future generation.
2. The Intentional Slaughter of Innocence; Decisive Refutation of the “Calculation Error” Lie
The most painful dimension of this tragedy is the establishment of the awareness and “intent” hidden behind this trigger. The attackers cannot hide behind the cold, soulless, and justifying term of “Collateral Damage.”

Legal Foundation - Article 8(2)(b) of the Rome Statute: The Court explicitly states in sub-paragraphs (i) and (ii): “Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities” and “Intentionally directing attacks against civilian objects, that is, objects which are not military objectives,” warrant international punishment.
Ground Reality: Technical reports by Al Jazeera prove that the missiles, with demonic precision, targeted the military base and the school separately, while the “medical clinic” situated between these two points remained completely untouched.
Conclusion: This impact pattern proves that the attackers possessed the exact coordinate map of the area. They knew exactly where the barracks were and where the primary school was. They chose to strike the school. This launch was not a miscalculation; it was a conscious decision to turn to ash the dreams of children whose only crime was being present in a classroom. This is the flawless realization of the “mental element” (mens rea / malicious intent) required by the Court to establish a war crime.
3. Maniacal Disregard for the Lives of Children; Flagrant Violation of the Principle of Proportionality
Even in the fiercest and blindest of wars, the lives of children must take precedence over any hypothetical military gain. There is no strategic interest in the world whose price is the dismemberment of little girls.

Legal Foundation - Article 8(2)(b) of the Rome Statute: Sub-paragraph (iv) explicitly states that “Intentionally launching an attack in the knowledge that such attack will cause incidental loss of life or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects… which would be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall military advantage anticipated” constitutes a war crime.
Ground Reality: The firing of an ultra-advanced, precision-guided missile at 10:45 AM—meaning exactly at the peak hours of students’ presence in the school—indicates the absolute knowledge of the attackers regarding the occurrence of a certain massacre.
Conclusion: What “military advantage” can equate to the blood of dozens of innocent little girls and justify the principle of proportionality? This attack is the embodiment of militaristic madness, the absence of human honor, and a blatant mockery of Article 8 of the Rome Statute.
4. The Chain of Command of the Crime and Criminal Responsibility; From Weapons Monopoly to the Shocking Confessions of Washington
The identity of the murder weapon and its perpetrators is no longer shrouded in mystery. Undeniable field evidence and the explicit confessions of authorities and legislative bodies in the United States directly connect the chain of command of this massacre to the White House and CENTCOM headquarters.

Legal Foundation - Articles 25 and 28 of the Rome Statute: Based on the principles of “Individual criminal responsibility” and “Responsibility of commanders and other superiors,” individuals who ordered the crime or failed to prevent its occurrence shall be held personally accountable before the Court.
Evidence, Reports, and Confessions of American Officials:
Field Evidence and Weapon Monopoly: The New York Times, examining the missile remnants discovered at the Minab school, confirmed the presence of components marked “Made in USA,” which precisely match the “Tomahawk” precision-guided cruise missile; a weapon exclusively held by the United States military and CENTCOM.
Refutation of the “Miscalculation” Lie and Proof of Intentional Crime: While CENTCOM initially attempted to downplay the tragedy as a “miscalculation,” Reuters, citing analytical data, confirmed that this primary school was bombed not once, but twice, with a 40-minute interval. No army bombs a school twice by accident; this was a premeditated mass murder that claimed the lives of 168 children and 14 teachers.
The President’s Disinformation and the Dissolution of Oversight Bodies: Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen, while holding Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth (Secretary of Defense) responsible for the martyrdom of these 175 individuals, rejected Trump’s claim regarding Iran’s involvement in the attack, calling it an “outright lie.” Simultaneously, Senator Elizabeth Warren revealed that Pete Hegseth had previously shut down and dismantled the “Office of Civilian Harm Mitigation,” indicating prior groundwork for the crime and a reckless disregard for human lives.
Rebellion of Legislators and the Call for International Trial: The scale of this tragedy was so vast that 46 Democratic senators, in an official letter to the Secretary of Defense, demanded an immediate investigation into this massacre (primarily of girls aged 7 to 12) and an examination of the role of “Artificial Intelligence tools” in it. Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib, noting that the Trump administration, after lying, finally confirmed the bombing of the school, explicitly called for Trump’s impeachment, Hegseth’s dismissal, and the accountability of the US government in international courts for “heinous war crimes.”
Conclusion: The dual firing of the exclusive Tomahawk missile at a civilian target, the confessions of officials, and the initial attempt at a cover-up prove that “Donald Trump” (President of the United States), “Pete Hegseth” (Secretary of Defense), and the “Commander of CENTCOM” are the undisputed instigators and perpetrators of this massacre. They must be placed behind the docket of the International Criminal Court without any political immunity.
A Call to Awakened Consciences to End the Era of Impunity
Today, the collapsed ashes at the Minab primary school stand before all institutions claiming human rights, the member states of the Geneva Conventions, and international courts, demanding justice with burned and slaughtered bodies. If the world remains silent in the face of the burning of innocent girls in a classroom, it has proven that international law is nothing but a worthless piece of paper meant to decorate diplomatic assemblies.

In the face of this formidable test, what is our historical responsibility?

Jurists and Global Bar Associations: They have a mission to draft a voluminous, reasoned, and undeniable indictment for referral to the International Criminal Court, firmly citing the examples stipulated in Article 8(2)(b) of the Rome Statute.
Public Opinion and Civil Society: They must be the loud voice of these voiceless little girls. Every word, every image, and every continuous plea for justice is a nail driven into the coffin of the criminals’ immunity.
The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court: Based on their inherent mission to safeguard human peace and security and combat the impunity of aggressors, they are morally and legally obligated to initiate an immediate, independent, and comprehensive investigation, and to indict and prosecute the perpetrators of this horrific crime.
Conclusion:
The little girls of Minab are today the silent victims of this modern savagery, but tomorrow they must be the symbol of the awakening of the global conscience. The court of history will drag not only the perpetrators and commanders who fired this missile to the pillory of judgment, but also all the governments, institutions, and individuals who remained silent in the face of the spilled blood of these defenseless angels. The International Criminal Court now stands at a great historical crossroads: does the sword of justice have the power to protect a “little girl in a school uniform,” or will it surrender forever to military arsenals?

Let us not allow the murderers of childhoods to once again escape the sharp blade of justice with a smirk on their lips.

Respectfully,

DeepLaw War Intel

هرچی بیشتر دقت میکنم هیچ شباهتی به مرکز نظامی پیدا نمی‌کنم